Mathematical Relationships and Basic Graphs - Math
Card 1 of 732
Simplify 
Simplify
Tap to reveal answer
Find the least common denominator (LCD) and convert each fraction to the LCD and then add. Simplify as necessary.

The result is an improper fraction because the numerator is larger than the denominator and can be simplified and converted to a mix numeral.

Find the least common denominator (LCD) and convert each fraction to the LCD and then add. Simplify as necessary.
The result is an improper fraction because the numerator is larger than the denominator and can be simplified and converted to a mix numeral.
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
All of the following matrix products are defined EXCEPT:
All of the following matrix products are defined EXCEPT:
Tap to reveal answer
Every matrix has a dimension, which is represented as the number of rows and columns. For example, a matrix with three rows and two columns is said to have dimension 3 x 2.
The matrix

has two rows and three columns, so its dimension is 2 x 3. (Remember that rows go from left to right, while columns run up and down.)
Matrix multiplication is defined only if the number of columns in the first matrix is equal to the number of rows on the second matrix. The easiest way to determine this is to write the dimension of each matrix. For example, let's say that one matrix has dimension a x b, and the second matrix has dimension c x d. We can only multiply the first matrix by the second matrix if the values of b and c are equal. It doesn't matter what the values of a and d are, as long as b (the number of columns in the first matrix) matches c (the number of rows in the second matrix).
Let's go back to the problem and analyze the choice
.
The dimension of the first matrix is 2 x 3, because it has two rows and three columns. The second matrix has dimension 2 x 2, because it has two rows and two columns.
We can't multiply these matrices because the number of columns in the first matrix (3) is not equal to the number of rows in the second matrix (2). Thus, this product is not defined.
The answer is
.
Every matrix has a dimension, which is represented as the number of rows and columns. For example, a matrix with three rows and two columns is said to have dimension 3 x 2.
The matrix
has two rows and three columns, so its dimension is 2 x 3. (Remember that rows go from left to right, while columns run up and down.)
Matrix multiplication is defined only if the number of columns in the first matrix is equal to the number of rows on the second matrix. The easiest way to determine this is to write the dimension of each matrix. For example, let's say that one matrix has dimension a x b, and the second matrix has dimension c x d. We can only multiply the first matrix by the second matrix if the values of b and c are equal. It doesn't matter what the values of a and d are, as long as b (the number of columns in the first matrix) matches c (the number of rows in the second matrix).
Let's go back to the problem and analyze the choice .
The dimension of the first matrix is 2 x 3, because it has two rows and three columns. The second matrix has dimension 2 x 2, because it has two rows and two columns.
We can't multiply these matrices because the number of columns in the first matrix (3) is not equal to the number of rows in the second matrix (2). Thus, this product is not defined.
The answer is .
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
Simplify.

Simplify.
Tap to reveal answer
Convert the mixed numbers into improper fractions by multiplying the whole number by the denominator and adding the numerator to get 
Dividing by a fraction is the same as multiplying by its reciprocal so the problem becomes 
Convert the mixed numbers into improper fractions by multiplying the whole number by the denominator and adding the numerator to get
Dividing by a fraction is the same as multiplying by its reciprocal so the problem becomes
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
Simplify
.
Simplify .
Tap to reveal answer
Chenge the mixed numbers into improper fractions by multiplying the whole number by the denominator and adding the numerator to get
.
Chenge the mixed numbers into improper fractions by multiplying the whole number by the denominator and adding the numerator to get
.
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
Find the
-intercepts for the graph given by the equation:

Find the -intercepts for the graph given by the equation:
Tap to reveal answer
To find the
-intercepts, we must set
.
To solve absolute value equations, we must understand that the absoute value function makes a value positive. So when we are solving these problems, we must consider two scenarios, one where the value is positive and one where the value is negative.



Now we must set up our two scenarios:
and 
and 
and 
To find the -intercepts, we must set
.
To solve absolute value equations, we must understand that the absoute value function makes a value positive. So when we are solving these problems, we must consider two scenarios, one where the value is positive and one where the value is negative.
Now we must set up our two scenarios:
and
and
and
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
Solve for
.

Solve for .
Tap to reveal answer

Divide both sides by 3.

Consider both the negative and positive values for the absolute value term.

Subtract 2 from both sides to solve both scenarios for
.

Divide both sides by 3.
Consider both the negative and positive values for the absolute value term.
Subtract 2 from both sides to solve both scenarios for .
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
Solve for
:

Solve for :
Tap to reveal answer
To solve absolute value equations, we must understand that the absoute value function makes a value positive. So when we are solving these problems, we must consider two scenarios, one where the value is positive and one where the value is negative.


and

This gives us:
and 

However, this question has an
outside of the absolute value expression, in this case
. Thus, any negative value of
will make the right side of the equation equal to a negative number, which cannot be true for an absolute value expression. Thus,
is an extraneous solution, as
cannot equal a negative number.
Our final solution is then

To solve absolute value equations, we must understand that the absoute value function makes a value positive. So when we are solving these problems, we must consider two scenarios, one where the value is positive and one where the value is negative.
and
This gives us:
and
However, this question has an outside of the absolute value expression, in this case
. Thus, any negative value of
will make the right side of the equation equal to a negative number, which cannot be true for an absolute value expression. Thus,
is an extraneous solution, as
cannot equal a negative number.
Our final solution is then
← Didn't Know|Knew It →

What are the possible values for
?
What are the possible values for ?
Tap to reveal answer
The absolute value measures the distance from zero to the given point.
In this case, since
,
or
, as both values are twelve units away from zero.
The absolute value measures the distance from zero to the given point.
In this case, since ,
or
, as both values are twelve units away from zero.
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
Tap to reveal answer
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
Solve:

Solve:
Tap to reveal answer
The absolute value can never be negative, so the equation is ONLY valid at zero.
The equation to solve becomes
.

The absolute value can never be negative, so the equation is ONLY valid at zero.
The equation to solve becomes .
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
Expression 1: 
Expression 2: 
Find the set of values for
where Expression 1 is greater than Expression 2.
Expression 1:
Expression 2:
Find the set of values for where Expression 1 is greater than Expression 2.
Tap to reveal answer
In finding the values for
where
, break the comparison of these two absolute value expressions into the four possible ways this could potentially be satisfied.
The first possibility is described by the inequality:

If you think of a number line, it is evident that there is no solution to this inequality since there will never be a case where subtracting from
will lead to a greater number than adding to
.
The second possibility, wherein
is negative and converted to its opposite to being an absolute value expression but
is positive and requires no conversion, can be represented by the inequality (where the sign is inverted due to multiplication by a negative):

We can simplify this inequality to find that
satisfies the conditions where
.
The third possibility can be represented by the following inequality (where the sign is inverted due to multiplication by a negative):

This is again simplified to
and is redundant with the above inequality.
The final possibility is represented by the inequality

This inequality simplifies to
. Rewriting this as
makes it evident that this inequality is true of all real numbers. This does not provide any additional conditions on how to satisfy the original inequality.
The only possible condition that satisfies the inequality is that which arises in two of the tested cases, when
.
In finding the values for where
, break the comparison of these two absolute value expressions into the four possible ways this could potentially be satisfied.
The first possibility is described by the inequality:
If you think of a number line, it is evident that there is no solution to this inequality since there will never be a case where subtracting from will lead to a greater number than adding to
.
The second possibility, wherein is negative and converted to its opposite to being an absolute value expression but
is positive and requires no conversion, can be represented by the inequality (where the sign is inverted due to multiplication by a negative):
We can simplify this inequality to find that satisfies the conditions where
.
The third possibility can be represented by the following inequality (where the sign is inverted due to multiplication by a negative):
This is again simplified to and is redundant with the above inequality.
The final possibility is represented by the inequality
This inequality simplifies to . Rewriting this as
makes it evident that this inequality is true of all real numbers. This does not provide any additional conditions on how to satisfy the original inequality.
The only possible condition that satisfies the inequality is that which arises in two of the tested cases, when .
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
What is the absolute value of -3?
What is the absolute value of -3?
Tap to reveal answer
The absolute value is the distance from a given number to 0. In our example, we are given -3. This number is 3 units away from 0, and thus the absolute value of -3 is 3.
If a number is negative, its absolute value will be the positive number with the same magnitude. If a number is positive, it will be its own absolute value.
The absolute value is the distance from a given number to 0. In our example, we are given -3. This number is 3 units away from 0, and thus the absolute value of -3 is 3.
If a number is negative, its absolute value will be the positive number with the same magnitude. If a number is positive, it will be its own absolute value.
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
What is the absolute value of 
What is the absolute value of
Tap to reveal answer
The absolute value is a measure of the distance of a point from the origin. Using the pythagorean distance formula to calculate this distance.
The absolute value is a measure of the distance of a point from the origin. Using the pythagorean distance formula to calculate this distance.
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
Simplify the expression.

Simplify the expression.
Tap to reveal answer
Combine like terms. Treat
as if it were any other variable.


Substitute to eliminate
.


Simplify.

Combine like terms. Treat as if it were any other variable.
Substitute to eliminate .
Simplify.
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
Simplify the radical.

Simplify the radical.
Tap to reveal answer

First, factor the term in the radical.


Now, we can simplify.



First, factor the term in the radical.
Now, we can simplify.
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
Multiply: 
Multiply:
Tap to reveal answer
FOIL:






FOIL:
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
Multiply: 
Multiply:
Tap to reveal answer
Since
and
are conmplex conjugates, they can be multiplied according to the following pattern:

Since and
are conmplex conjugates, they can be multiplied according to the following pattern:
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
Multiply:

Multiply:
Tap to reveal answer
Since
and
are conmplex conjugates, they can be multiplied according to the following pattern:

Since and
are conmplex conjugates, they can be multiplied according to the following pattern:
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
Evaluate: 
Evaluate:
Tap to reveal answer
can be evaluated by dividing
by 4 and noting the remainder. Since
- that is, since dividing 45 by 4 yields remainder 1:

can be evaluated by dividing
by 4 and noting the remainder. Since
- that is, since dividing 45 by 4 yields remainder 1:
← Didn't Know|Knew It →
Evaluate: 
Evaluate:
Tap to reveal answer
← Didn't Know|Knew It →